Tag Archives: Scientific Restitution

We gave an interview in the Tagesspiegel about our work that is displayed in the exhibition “Uruk – 5000 years of the megacity“, which will be open on the 25th of April 2013. There is an online version of the article here.

Not so long ago, I was thinking about the process of archaeological reconstruction and how I see the results in contrast to a visitor in a museum for example. I started a small survey among my friends and family and realized, that most people take the restitutions seen in museums, television or magazines for granted. As archaeologists, we know that reconstructions are merely a visualised theory and that there are different ways to interpret archaeological data. This is not always the case with a broader audience.

The way from excavated data to a visualised reconstruction in a museum is long and complicated. Often, where the archaeological evidence is scarce, parallels from other excavations, sometimes of different regions or periods, texts or cultural anthropology have to help. Therefore, a restitution can never be exact. Of course, scientific reconstructions offer more accuracy than non-scientific ones, but nevertheless, it will never be a 100% correct.

I think this is not comprehensible for visitors in museums, children in schools or everyone else in front of the TV. In my opinion, we (the archaeologists, curators, teachers, film-makers) have to communicate this fact far more clearly and there is actually no reason not to do so. Besides simply saying that a restitution is maybe not a 100% correct, there are many ways to present this: one could show alternatives, highlight uncertain parts of a reconstruction or differentiate between the different sources that led to the restitution and point that out. I think, the audience will understand and actually welcome the participation in the archaeological thinking process.

In this small example you can clearly distinguish between excavated remains and reconstructed upper part. This graphic shows the Anu-Antum-temple in Uruk of the Seleucid period. If you are interested, you can read more about it here.

Material: © DAI

Today we finished the work on the restitution and visualisation of the “White Temple” (Building B) and the Anu Ziggurat in Uruk, a very famous sacred complex dating to the Late Uruk Period. The project is part of the ongoing Uruk Visualisation-Project that we are working on for the German Archaeological Institute in Berlin. The results turned out very nice: We created two possibilities of reconstruction for the “White Temple”. The final images show comprehensive exterior views of the temple on top of the ziggurat, several sections through the building and some very nice interior views that tentatively reveal the lighting conditions inside the temple.

Sorry for not posting any pictures here, but that will have to wait until the publication is out. Some images will probably be on display, however, in the upcoming Uruk exhibition in the Pergamon Museum in April 2013. We will keep you updated on that.

Warning: in_array() [function.in-array]: Wrong datatype for second argument in /var/www/web1604/html/blog/wp-includes/class.wp-dependencies.php on line 213

Warning: in_array() [function.in-array]: Wrong datatype for second argument in /var/www/web1604/html/blog/wp-includes/class.wp-dependencies.php on line 213